Sunday, December 9, 2012

Future paper topic: Cats and Gender in Medieval Europe

This horrifying incident on campus made me think about the treatment of cats in the Middle Ages and how they always seem to be the ones to get tortured and maligned if any animal is going to be. I was especially interested in the folklore of cats and their connection to witches, and I wondered if a connection could be made between medieval attitudes toward women as witches with cats as companions, and the modern stereotype of the crazy cat lady or the sad single woman who lives with her cats.


Then again, here is a very different kind of cat companion from an Old Irish monk's poem: 

Version by W.H. Auden:
Pangur, white Pangur, How happy we are
Alone together, scholar and cat
Each has his own work to do daily;
For you it is hunting, for me study.
Your shining eye watches the wall;
My feeble eye is fixed on a book.
You rejoice, when your claws entrap a mouse;
I rejoice when my mind fathoms a problem.
Pleased with his own art, neither hinders the other;
Thus we live ever without tedium and envy.


http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mdtamsHbqJ1qbisi2o1_r3_400.gif

It would be very interesting to sort out the cultural and folkloric origins of these different beliefs about cats, evaluate them with respect to gender and female sexuality, and follow them into the modern era.



Monday, December 3, 2012

Books I reread, and why

The Lord of the Rings, J.R.R. Tolkien

This is probably my most reread book, and my reasons for rereading overlap the most between pleasure and professionalism, though it's safe to say they still lean more toward pleasure. I read the trilogy about every other year, and I find that it grows richer the more I know about the real medieval literature and myth that inspired it.

Pride and Prejudice, Jane Austen

I haven't been back to this one in a few years, but it is still the standard against which I measure character development and tightness of plot.

The House of the Spirits, Isabel Allende

I've read this one twice, and I once tried (unsuccessfully) to read it in Spanish. Both times were purely for pleasure.


Ender's Game, Orson Scott Card

I read this one a couple times when I was in middle school and high school, and then again recently, and it is one of those books that, as Spacks notes, shows its literary greatness with every reread. There are lots of science fiction novels, like The Hunger Games, that are spellbinding for a while but which lose a lot of their luster on a rereading, but every time I read Ender's Game, I am more impressed. (Now that I think about it, it has a lot of interesting similarities to The Hunger Games.) I have always read this book for pleasure, but my most recent rereading has convinced me that this book might be worth devoting some research to.


A Wrinkle in Time, Madeleine L'Engle
Another childhood favorite that I've seen pop up in surprising places lately. Only a couple weeks ago, I read some of a new graphic novel version of the book. A pleasure read.


To Kill A Mockingbird, Harper Lee
I read this book three or four times in high school, but I haven't read it lately. It doesn't have the impact for me that it used to, and now when I read it, I am reading for the sentimental love of favorite scenes and narration and the fond memories of past readings.


Sir Gawain and the Green Knight
This one started out as a pleasure read, but subsequent rereadings have been mainly professional. I've been rereading it aloud this semester with Song School for an entirely new professional purpose: polishing my pronunciation of Middle English.


Beowulf
Probably my most reread professional book. I gave it one cursory reading in high school, reread it in college, mostly out loud because I liked how the words sounded, again in college for a class, and then again for another class. Over break, I will be reading it again in preparation for my Beowulf course with Rob Fulk next semester, and then over the course of the spring, I will read it in Old English with that class. This is an especially interesting rereading because it will be the first time I have read it entirely in its original language, so in some ways it will be a first reading as well as a rereading.

"Wulf and Eadwacer"



"The Wanderer"



Rereading Davis

"Theatricality is not likely to be present when a performance is so absorbing that the audience forgets it is spectating." (Tracy Davis, "Theatricality and Civil Society in Theatricality", p. 128)

-The spectator must decide that the performance is significant for them before they feel sympathy. (p. 129)

"As long as sympathy is withheld, the theatrical circumstance persists; only if sympathy is granted can we cease to be spectators to ourselves and others." (p. 141)

-The spectators feel admiration and sympathy for the brave man on the scaffold, but they turn away from the brave man being pilloried. We choose sympathy when it benefits us, ennobles us, not when it makes us feel shame. (p. 150)

"A world where only sympathy occurs would be a dull one indeed, but it is the conditioned choice to sympathize or theatricalize that matters." (p. 153)

"Is this not how new law is conceived: not by cathecting with victims but by enabling the seeing of acts (sexual harassment, stalking, driving under the influence of alcohol) where before there was either 'nothing' or sympathetic social sanction?" (p. 154)

New things to consider in my second reading:

1) The first time around, I didn't focus so much on her interpretation of sympathy as a choice, but now I think that has far-reaching implications for transport. We can be transported only because we are willing to allow ourselves to do so, and that allowance is predicated on complex personal, cultural, and social situations. Maybe the important question is not, "What is the quality of science fiction that transports me?" but "What is it in me that is so willing to be transported by science fiction?"

2) Empathy is not unselfish. This was underlined by the example about the pilloried man vs. the hanged man, and although it might seem obvious, it deserves closer attention than I have given it. If sympathy/empathy is a choice we make, then it is affected by the flaws of human nature that affect every choice. I often think of empathy uncritically as a good effect of encountering difference through literature, but I should be more aware of the circumstances in which empathy is generated and its more selfish benefits to the one who empathizes.

3) Naming something brings it into view. This one comes mainly from the last quote from page 154. Science fiction and fantasy is uniquely equipped to give new names to things, especially when it constructs societies radically different from our own. I think immediately of the concept of shifgrethor in Le Guin's The Left Hand of Darkness and the dispossessed language usage in The Dispossessed. I never thought of the ways that possessive language might have negative consequences with regard to the way I think about other human beings (for example, Le Guin's Odonians would say "the mother" instead of "my mother" because the use of a possessive would imply ownership over another person).

Notes on Spacks

"Rereading of this sort, the kind we do for the sake of teaching or writing, may feel at times merely routine, yet it can also come to serve as an index of literary quality."
-Patricia Meyer Spacks, "Professional Rereading" in On Rereading, p. 163

"The value of recreational rereading inheres largely in its unpredictable results."
-p. 164

Professional rereaders "direct the text to our purposes rather than give ourselves over to its intents."
-p. 165

-collective rereading is largely responsible for canon formation

Sunday, December 2, 2012

Visits to living history museums

http://www.connerprairie.org/Plan-Your-Visit/1836-Prairietown/Meet-the-Citizens.aspx




http://www.indianahistory.org/indiana-experience/you-are-there

http://www.indianahistory.org/indiana-experience/you-are-there

http://www.indianahistory.org/indiana-experience/you-are-there

Witcomb Notes

"This opposition [between multimedia and high art] in relation to the introduction of multimedia into museums is sometimes unhelpful." (Andrea Witcomb, "The Materiality of Virtual Technologies: A New Approach to Thinking about the Impact of Multimedia in Museums", p. 36)

-defining multimedia as 'other' results in limited readings and applications (p. 36)

-through multimedia, museums become more openly politicized (p. 37)
-an experiential model of democracy (p. 46)

Notes on Walsh

"It is the mechanical reproduction--the photograph--that created the aura of the original, much as it was the machine that created the 'handmade,' the negative that created the 'positive,' and the digital that gave retroactive birth to its latent opposite, the 'analog.'"

-Peter Walsh, "Rise and Fall of the Post-Photographic Museum: Technology and the Transformation of Art", p. 29

Election Day: Looking back on a private transformation

I have voted in two presidential elections, and the only constant for me between the two was watching the election results in my room from my computer. I've undergone many changes in the four years that passed between, my party affiliation not the least of these, and in some ways, voting in this election was a consummation of that change. It's a very neat way to track cycles of personal development, and it will be interesting to see where I am at and how I am thinking when the next election comes around. I don't expect to careen crazily between parties again as I have these past four years, but I do hope to see a refinement of my views and a filling in of the fine lines between broad platform statements.

The way I spent both election nights--sitting up late with my laptop, wearing pajamas and flipping between Facebook and news and Netflix--speaks to the privacy of this transformation, and also the ways in which I have kept it silent. The election polarized my Facebook friends pretty neatly according to rural and urban geography, and I chose not to add my voice to the mix. My brother and I have been having a lively series of political debates via private messages on Facebook, and I received and sent a message to him the next day, but I didn't make a single public comment on the election results. I often keep silent because I am unsure what to say, and I don't like to say anything until I'm sure about it, but I hope that by the next election I will have found a voice in this discussion. I want to find the right balance between confidence and picking fights with my younger cousin over a pro-Romney blog.

Best of luck to future-Andrea in her 2016 voting.

Kirschenblatt-Gimblett and the New Zealand Hobbit

http://www.theonering.net/torwp/category/hobbit/

http://www.nme.com/filmandtv/news/
the-hobbit-star-martin-freeman-calls-bilbo-baggins/289698


As I read Barbara Kirschenblatt-Gimblett's article on how museum curation is heavily tied to tourism, "Destination Culture: Tourism, Museums, and Culture," my mind turned to The Hobbit, a common occurrence when I am reading anything lately, but this time it seemed applicable to the article. New Zealand has been in the news a lot lately with Hobbit-themed marketing ploys/displays of national pride. It's increasingly difficult to separate the two as the nation has embraced Jackson's Lord of the Rings industry with enthusiasm.

These Hobbit-themed gold coins, featuring elvish runes and the movie faces of Gandalf, Bilbo, and Thorin, are not only collectibles but also legal tender in New Zealand.

This New Zealand airline safety video also made the social media rounds a few weeks ago.



With these kinds of ads, New Zealand is positioning itself as Middle-Earth--the place to come when you want to visit the actual land of Tolkien. It's the only place I know of that has so successfully supplanted the original 'real location' of a fictional world. England still has its claim on Middle-Earth, as illustrated by the 2012 Olympic Opening Ceremonies, where many saw a stadium recreation of English countryside as a hobbit village. But if you want to actually walk in Middle-Earth, you go to New Zealand.

http://www.comrz.com/blogs/my-blog--stefan/london-2012-
olympics---opening-and-closing-ceremony-highlights

I'm not sure what conclusions to draw from all this. Kirschenblatt-Gimblett, who is quick to point out the imperialist and cultual heritage motivations behind museum-keeping in different ages, might decide that the use of New Zealand as surrogate Hobbiton still whispers of imperialist disregard of the cultures of places that aren't England--we need an exotic and faraway land to serve as a real-life fantasy world, and we can cover over its native culture in favor of our imported one. But I don't think this interpretation fully explains the pride that many New Zealanders seem to take in their image as Middle-Earth, not the sizable benefits they gain from it. To me, it is most interesting how we have cultivated so many different locations and museum preserves for Lord of the Rings--it exists in England and in New Zealand, in movie studios and sound stages and scale models. 

Saturday, December 1, 2012

Impressions of the IU Dance Gala

via indiana.edu

http://madeira.hccanet.org/project1_2011/devinep1/gamestats.html

http://centaursleepover.blogspot.com/2010/06/

Kealiinohomoku

Ethnic qualities of ballet, as listed in "An Anthropologist Looks at Ballet as a Form of Ethnic Dance":

-proscenium stage
-3-part, 2-hour performance, curtain calls and applause
-French terminology
-Western customs enacted onstage
-romance, sorcery, mistaken identity, tragic misunderstanding
-biblical themes, Christian holidays, afterlife
-humans as animals, fairies, witches, step-parents, beautiful virgins
-bodies create long lines, legs revealed, slender bodies, airy quality
-set and props: horses and swans (not pigs, buffalo, eagles), grains and roses (not yams, coconuts, acorns)
-economic pursuits portrayed

This list in Kealiinohomoku's article reinforced for me that these are the kind of things that make study interesting for me. I've only seen a ballet once in my life, when I was invited by a friend to see The Nutcracker in elementary school, and the main thing I remember is being disappointed that there was no dialogue, so ballet has never been an interest of mine. But for a moment this list made it interesting because ballet was no longer a omnipresent high-toned blandness but a cultural artifact made up of myths, religion, and conditioned expectations. On this list, what most attracts me is the styling of human actors as animals, fairies, witches, beautiful virgins, and sorcerers.

Conquergood and Hybrid Scholarship

"Performance studies struggles to open the space between analysis and action, and to pull the pin on the binary opposition between theory and practice. This embrace of different ways of knowing is radical because it cuts to the root of how knowledge is organized in the academy."
-Conquergood, "Performance Studies: Interventions and Radical Research," in The Performance Studies Reader, p. 145-6

"Scriptocentrism is the hallmark of Western imperialism."
-Conquergood, p. 147

"I want to be very clear about this point: textocentrism--not texts--is the problem."
-Conquergood, p. 151

-hybrid scholarship produces creative performances alongside written research
-Conquergood, p. 152

Conquergood reminds me of Jackson in impressing that we should be departmentally inclusive and try to cultivate practical and creative projects alongside research. As someone who is neither a performer nor really a researcher of performance, I still think this injunction has value for me. We all end up in the English department because at some point in our lives we really liked to read, but many of us also arrived here harboring a desire to write. Some of the scholars I admire most were active both in research within their field and creative writing outside of it, and you can see both sides of their work overlapping and enriching each other. In the same way, I want to hold onto the enjoyment of writing as I delve into a research-heavy field. Even when my creative writing is not suitable for the light of day, it helps me better appreciate and understand the things that I am reading.

Kinetic Empathy

"In what ways might one come to feel inhabited by the sense of motion, but also emotion conveyed in and by another's body movement?" (Susan Leigh Foster, "Choreographing Empathy", p. 81)

-Rainer's analysis of dance separates the kinetic from the emotional
"Rainer worked assiduously to cultivate and valorize a 'pure' physicality and to imbue it with its own kind of power and dynamism, in part in order to eschew claims of universal sharings of values based in universally shared emotional states." (Foster, 89)

"In contemporary discourse, empathy is frequently viewed as embodied simulation and sympathy as a response involving feelings." (Matthew Reason and Dee Reynolds, "Kinesthesia, Empathy, and Related Pleasures: An Inquiry into Audience Experience of Watching Dance", p. 53)

Two different interpretive motivations in dance:
Don: "engagement and empathy are produced by intimacy and intensity."
Nicole: "a degree of distance, facilitated by music, is necessary for a kind of empathetic engagement, which involves a suspension of reality." (Reason and Reynolds, 70)

-three different methods of engagement with dance: sympathy, empathy, contagion (Reason and Reynolds, 71)

Ngai, "Stuplimity" in Ugly Feelings

Stuplimity creates an "open feeling" in the reader: "a condition of utter receptivity in which difference is perceived (and perhaps even 'felt') prior to its qualification or conceptualization."
-Ngai, p. 261

Could stuplimity offer one way to overcome Davis' objections to transport? Open feeling could create empathy on the part of the spectator for difference without "insisting on sameness as a criterion of worth." (Davis, Theatricality and Civil Society in Theatricality)

Friday, November 30, 2012

Richard III in motorcycle leather

From this IU production of Richard III:
http://www.indiana.edu/~thtr/productions/2012/richardiii.shtml

For the productions I've seen for this class, I seem to chronically pick bad seats (see Don Giovanni: Not the kind of transport Cavell experienced). I spent most of Richard III looking straight down at the actors, who never acknowledged that some of their audience was above them.

Two things I noticed about Richard III that have to do with our discussions and readings:

1. Very clear (sometimes obtrusive) use of dramaturgy. I noticed this most in the political ads on the small screens before the play started and at the end of the play when Elizabeth came onto the balcony in full Tudor regalia. And, of course, in the leather jackets.

2. Intrusion of the actors' bodies. I call this an intrusion only because it seemed to jump out at specific moments rather than being an integral part of the production. Richard's limp and the costuming of his leg and arm necessarily drew attention to the actor's body when he moved quickly or referenced them in the play. Also, the moment when Anne spit on Richard and he licked his fingers jolted me out of thinking of them as characters into thinking of them as actors and bodies.

Notes on Crane

"Early modern concepts of performance include embodied, non-representational aspects of drama as well as its implication in discursive systems." -Mary Crane, "What Was Performance?", p. 171

"[Exercise] gestures toward a prediscursive kinesthetic form of learning that need not necessarily bear a representational or ideological force." -p.172

"What kind of transformative experience might a play provide for an audience if it is not a conventionally moral one?" -p. 180

These quotes interest me because they suggest that embodied, kinesthetic physicality might be one way to effect transport without "insisting on sameness as a criterion of worth" (Davis, "Theatricality and Civil Society in Theatricality).

Hollywood casting and Hodgdon's "Replicating Richard"

"How does this 'actor's body' become the bearer of texts, of social as well as theatrical histories? How does it become susceptible to meanings? How does 'character' get revisited in relation to the body of a specific actor, inviting spectators to engage in a negotiation between actor and character? And how does that double body function as a locus for a spectator's imaginative desire to reperform the role?" -Barbara Hodgdon, "Replicating Richard: Body Doubles, Body Politics"

http://memory-beta.wikia.com/wiki/Spock

http://www.eonline.com/news/364526/


Today I'm mostly interested in this question as it might apply to casting decisions for film, which are becoming more and more a topic of online debate as the casting process becomes more public for big films and remakes have also suddenly popped up everywhere. How much is our perception of the character tied to the actor's body, and how is that complicated when a famous movie role (which, unlike a role in a play, is strongly associated with one particular body) is remade using another actor? The publicity of the casting decision for Katniss in The Hunger Games, for instance, results in a ghosting of different actress who might have been chosen instead of Jennifer Lawrence, and the character of Spock has subtly changed for me because the body representing him is now that of Zachary Quinto rather than Leonard Nimoy.

Nine Actresses Who Were Almost Katniss:
http://www.hollywood.com/news/Hunger_Games_9_Actresses_Who_Were_Almost_Katniss/21459748

The Antisyzygy of Black Watch

"The literature [of Scotland] is the literature of a small country...in this shortness and cohesion the most favourable of conditions seem to be offered for a making of a general estimate. But on the other hand, we find at closer scanning that the cohesion at least in formal expression and in choice of material is only apparent, that the literature is remarkably varied, and that it becomes, under the stress of foreign influence, almost a zigzag of contradictions. The antithesis need not, however, disconcert us. Perhaps in the very combination of opposites--what either of the two Thomases, of Norwich and Cromarty, might have been willing to call 'the Caledonian antisyzygy'--we have a reflection of the contrasts which the Scot shows at every turn, in his political and ecclesiastical history, in his polemical restlessness, in his adaptability, which is another way of saying that he has made allowance for new conditions, in his practival judgement, which is the admission that two sides of the matter have been considered. If therefore, Scottish history and life are, as an old northern writer said of something else, "varied with a clean contrair spirit," we need not be surprised to find that in his literature the Scot presents two aspects which appear contradictory. Oxymoron was ever the bravest figure, and we must not forget that disorderly order is order after all."
-G. Gregory Smith, Scottish Literature: Character and Influence, 1919

This essay introduced into Scottish literary studies the idea of antisyzygy, which has never entirely left it since. Maureen Martin defined it as "the idea of dueling polarities within one entity," and I might define it as an internalized paradox necessary to the formation of an identity. In my seminar course on Middle Scots Poets with Michael Adams, this idea has come up frequently and been one of the guiding principles in evaluating how Scottish identity is constructed in literature.

"The Flyting of Dunbar and Kennedy" is my favorite piece of Scottish literature, and it typifies this antisyzygy neatly. I have never read anything that is simultaneously so artfully constructed and so bawdy. Here is an excerpt of the poem, just to give you an idea of its rollicking nature:

Iersche brybour baird, vyle beggar with thy brattis,
Cuntbittin crawdoun Kennedy, coward of kynd,
Evill-farit and dryit as Denseman on the rattis,
Lyk as the gleddis had on thy gulesnowt dynd,
Mismaid monstour, ilk mone owt of thy mynd,
Renunce, rebald, thy ryming, thow bot royis.
Thy trechour tung has tane ane Heland strynd,
Ane Lawland ers wald make a bettir noyis...

Mauch mutton, byt buttoun, peilit gluttoun, air to Hilhous,
Rank beggar, ostir dregar, flay fleggar in the flet.
Chittirlilling, ruch rilling, lik shilling in the milhous,
Baird rehator, theif of nator, fals tratour, feyindis gett,
Filling of tauch, rak sauch--cry crauch, thow art oursett!
Muttoun dryver, girnall ryver, yadswyver, fowll fell thee!
Heretyk, lunatyk, purspyk, carlingis pet,
Rottin crok, dirtin dok--cry cok, or I sall quell thee!

-from TEAMS edition, William Dunbar: The Complete Works, ed. John Conlee

The production we saw of Black Watch had a few qualities in common with this poem. One was clearly the free use of expletives and insults, but another, I think, was the enactment of antisyzygy. In the poem, the antisyzygy takes the form of Highland versus Lowland, each insulting the other but both together forming a cohesive whole. In the play, the antisyzygy involves a simultaneous desire to glorify the history of Scotland at war and to expose it as anything but glorious.

But these dueling polarities aren't as well integrated into the whole of Black Watch as they are in "The Flyting," and at the end, the play fell back into military-movie tropes of brotherhood and solidarity and marching on in the face of defeat. One of the most successful parts of the play was the letter-reading scene and its paired ten-seconds-of-fighting scene, both of which involved dance. Together they captured something about the mix of emotions that must be involved in being a soldier in Iraq. But the least successful scene in the play was when the officer tries to convince the main character to remain in the army. After starting out so strongly, the play reverted back to a stereotypical exchange that boils down to this: "Son, what the army needs is a few good men like you." "I'm sorry, sir, but my buddy's death has made me embittered and cynical." Black Watch can't sustain its portrayal of antisyzygy, possibly because it doesn't address the problem of specifically Scottish military problems directly enough.

The Archive Calls

There is just something about a very old book. It's different from any other kind of artifact--it evokes the sacredness of a church, the authority of a crown, the personality of an artist, and the humanity of a pair of shoes. You can see its richness and beauty, but you can also see shadows of the person who wrote it, the person who read it. This is certainly true of the beautiful illuminated medieval manuscripts that we looked at for our group blog post in the Lilly Library, but for me it is also true of my set of Dickens novels that used to belong to my grandfather.


Pictures from Sara Taylor:
http://writingperformance.blogspot.com/2012/10/group-blog-post-andrea-iris-jenna-sara.html

This assignment has reminded me again how much I love books--not just the ideas they contain or the theoretical approaches they support, but the physical books themselves. I think it has to do with my image of the scholar, which is, predictably, tied to medievalism. If I were to imagine the ideal image of scholarship, it would probably look something like this:

http://www.news.hypercrit.net/2012/08/10/poring-over-the-meaning-of-pore-over/

And while on some levels that idealized image is a problem that I'll need to grow beyond at some point, on another level that image informs me about what really calls to me in this profession and where my interests truly lie. I enjoyed looking at the Book of Hours and thinking about the theoretical applications of performativity to the manuscript, but I would much prefer to lock myself up alone with such a book for weeks on end, learning its old language and deciphering its script, maybe someday recovering something from it that no one has been able to read or understand for a thousand years. To me, the call of the archive is a powerful one, and during this project it has been helpful to realize more precisely why.

Sunday, October 21, 2012

Rethinking about feeling historical

"The structure of an affect has, therefore, no inevitable relation to the emotions that may cluster in the wake of its activity, nor should it."
-Lauren Berlant, "Thinking about Feeling Historical, in Political Emotions

"Life can no longer be lived even phantasmagorically as a melodrama, as Aristotelian tragedy spread to ordinary people, as a predictable arc that is shaped by acts, facts, or fates."
-Berlant

http://bayterracecafe.wordpress.com
While I am convinced by parts of Berlant's argument, such as the first quote where she argues that any number of emotions can legitimately proceed from a spectator's reaction to an event, I am not sure that most people do not perceive these emotions as part of a melodramatic, tragedic, or otherwise generic arc. It reminded me of my previous post on the course blog (http://writingperformance.blogspot.com/2012/09/911-response-andrea.html) where I talked about my childhood reaction to September 11. Berlant may be right that human responses to any given event are of infinite variety, but we most often interpret using the models that are nearest to hand.

Phelan: The Ephemerality of Performance

"To the degree that performance attempts to enter the economy of reproduction it betrays and lessens the promise of its own ontology."
-Peggy Phelan, "The Ontology of Performance," in Unmarked: The Politics of Performance

"Performance approaches the Real through resisting the metaphorical reduction of the two into one."
-Phelan

"'What history cannot assimilate, Felman argues, 'is the implicitly analytical dimension of all radical or fecund thoughts, of all new theories: the "force" of their "performance" (always somewhat subversive) and their "residual smile" (always somewhat self-subversive).'"
-qtd. in Phelan


from Ursula Le Guin's short story, "The Kerastion," printed in A Fisherman of the Inland Sea:

"Even while they watched, the wind destroyed Kwatewa's sculpture. Soon there was only a shapeless lump and a feathering of white sand blown across the proving ground. Beauty had gone back to the Mother. That the sculpture had been destroyed so soon and so utterly was a great honor to the maker."

"His death was no shame, since there had been nothing for him to do but die. There was no fine, no ablution, no purification, for what he had done. Shepherds had found the cave where he had kept the stones, great marble pieces from the cave walls, carved into copies of his own sandsculptures, his own sacred work for the Solstice and the Hariba: sculptures of stone, abominable, durable, desecrations of the body of the Mother."

The Stage Life of a Prop

"This cumulative absorption of meaning is augmented by moments at which the handkerchief metonymically invokes its medeival predecessors."
-Andrew Sofer, The Stage Life of Props

How about a different prop?

https://www.theatrefolk.com/spotlights/the-greek-theatre
http://blog.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/blog/posts/music-mondays-mummers-mumming/
http://www.thebookofdays.com/months/dec/24a.htm
http://waldorfcampusconnection.blogspot.com/2010/04/shakespeare-masquerade-ball-saturday.html
http://www.philipcoppens.com/vforvendetta.html
http://wakingideas.com/blog/2012/07/tdkr-top-10-accurate-spoilers-from-the-dark-knight-rises/

Palimsests

"An object is never of a singular moment but instead combines ingredients from several times."
-Jonathan Gil Harris, "Palimpsested Time: Towards a Theory of Untimely Matter"

Cicero Palimsest http://www.skypoint.com/members/waltzmn/ShortDefs.html

Archimeded Palimsest
http://www.computus.org/journal/?p=1079 

http://www.postmodernpalimpsest.com

http://www.flickriver.com/photos/christianmontone/4000690499/

My cat, Ramona

Fractious Relatives: Image and Caption

"What captioning protocols might we devise that, while acknowledging how image, caption, and text are a tripod of meaning, would accord the image a more privileged status?"
-Barbara Hodgdon, "Photography, Theater, Mnemonics: Thirteen Ways of Looking at the Still"

Via Goodreads.com
There are several unforgivable flaws in this book cover, and they have to do with the relationship of the image to the text of the book itself. First, the character depicted, Ged, is supposed to have brown skin and dark hair. This type of alteration is a chronic problem with visual adaptations of Le Guin's work, and it proves the point she was trying to make with the physical descriptions of her characters in the first place. Also, at no point in the book does Ged shoot lightning bolts out of his fingertips, as he appears to do here. This image is subject to its title, in elegant and somewhat foreign-looking font, and the author's name, which is featured prominently above the title in all caps. The smaller-font recommendation at the top also mitigates our understanding of the image.

kids.aol.com
For reasons that I have never really thought through until now, I despise book covers that are based on the movie. Part of it is a snobby, hipsterish desire to let people know that I liked this book before everybody saw it onscreen. But a larger part of it, probably, is that this image is subverting the primacy of the book even while it tries to sell the book. The title uses the script and colors of the movie posters, Prince Caspian appears in a obligatory 'epic' pose that differs greatly from his younger and more frightened image on the 1970 edition that I own. Everything about this implies the supremacy of the movie version, down to the bottom caption, "The Original Novels by C.S. Lewis," as if a movie-goer might stumble onto this book cover and be surprised to learn that their favorite new movie also has its own book.

http://screeninsight.blogspot.com/2011/10/star-wars-episode-iv-new-hope-george.html

This is a deservedly famous movie poster, and this example is interesting for the way the 'informational' text is sharply divided from the image and its accompanying text. The only thing that bridges these two elements is the title, which is appropriately half text and half image itself. It is text in that the title is made up of words, but the lettering is shaped and colored in a signature way that makes it more a logo than a text, and the words have a perspective that reminds the viewer of the prologue effect that Lucas uses at the beginning of each Star Wars film. 

Reflections on Photographs

In her article, "Seeing Sentiment: Photography, Race, and the Innocent Eye," Laura Wexler argues that cultural theory has refused to read photographs, instead preferring to accept them as factual testaments. The notable exception is feminist theory, but Wexler adds:

"...it has been relatively silent about the internal dynamics of objectification within its own ranks, woman over woman, and about the ways in which women themselves have gained and lost from the racial and class power differentials among men." (163)

For me, this was the most thought-provoking quote in Wexler's article because it its far-reaching implications for women's studies. I recently heard an excellent lecture from Penelope Anderson on her new book, Friendship's Shadows: Women's Friendships and the Politics of Betrayal in England, 1640-1705, and I think the study of women's friendship is one field in which these "internal dynamics of objectification" should be explored.

Sunday, September 30, 2012

Thing Theory and Awkward Family Photos

I was very interested in Bernstein's description of thing theory in her article, "Dances with Things," and I've been looking for a way to apply it to my ideas about medievalism that have been fermenting these past several weeks. Bernstein's use of photos led me to a favorite site of mine, Awkward Family Photos, and I found several examples of medieval-themed awkwardness. Like the  cosplay and reenactment photos I posted earlier, these pictures all involve props and costumes, and I'd like to look at a few of them with thing theory in mind.

Bernstein explains the theory briefly in her article: "Things, but not objects, script actions. Martin Heidegger and more recent scholars of 'thing theory' define an object as a chunk of matter that one looks through or beyond to understand something human. A thing, in contrast, asserts itself within a field of matter . . . The difference between objects and things, then, is not essential but situational and subjective . . . An object becomes a thing when it invites a person to dance." (69-70)


In this photo, the obvious and awkward 'thing' is the chain mail. The family has responded to the thing's invitation to dance with great enthusiasm, but the different ways they have employed it speak to their separate reactions to the thing. The man wears the chain mail in a very typical way, a way that medieval soldiers might have actually worn it. The woman, however, wears hers like a metal bikini. In fact, it immediately reminded me of Princess Leia's infamous metal bikini in Star Wars: Return of the Jedi. The baby's chain mail shows that the parents are interested in their child one day responding to the thing as they have. 


I'll call this photo medieval because it seems from the tags on the website that the people in the photo considered it to be so. The things in this picture include costumes, props, and set. The costumes are notably gendered, just as in the chain mail photo, with the man wearing a 'period' costume and the girls wearing sexualized costumes of dubious historical origin. The woman in the back seems to be wearing a 'barmaid' kind of outfit that is slightly more historical-ish than the girls' clothes. The props they are holding also invite this kind of gendered performance--the man holds a sword and the girls hold tamborines.


This photo is my favorite. I don't know the circumstances in which it was taken, but I'm tempted to guess that it took place at a gathering like the Society for Creative Anachronism. It has a specific date and location, indicating some kind of public social event, and the title "Friends of the Realm" sounds very like the kind of language the SCA uses. I would also guess that the picture was taken in front of a screen and the background was added afterward. Thus the key things here are the costumes and the prop weapons. Here the costumes are both fairly appropriate to their use in medieval period, unlike the chain mail bikini and the harem girl costumes. The woman's outfit doesn't veer toward the overtly sexualized, and the weapons also invite her to depart from a traditionally gendered role. I wonder how the girls in the photo above would have posed if they had been handed battle axes instead of tamborines.

What I notice most in these pictures is the way that costumes and props from the medieval era tend to script gender. While the men in these pictures are performing fairly literal roles from what they imagine to be the Middle Ages, the women are often adopting highly sexualized and anachronistic roles. The medieval era simply has more to offer male performers, and the women are creating their performances based on an assumption of a male world. This could also be said of race--I didn't find any photos of awkward black families posing in chain mail. In these photos, scriptive things form an essential part of the performance of medievalism, and these things tend to imply a white male performer.